About this website: Theatre Bristol thought it would be a really good idea if we created a regular space where people interested in theatre in Bristol can come together to discuss what they're up to, we can say what we're up to, and we can all discuss what we’re not up to but think we ought to be. This website hosts the notes from all Theatre Bristol's TYTM meetings and enables the conversations started in those meetings to continue online.
TYTM1 - July 2009: In July 2009 over a hundred people came together at Bristol Old Vic to do just that. This website hosts the notes from that meeting and allows the conversations started that day to continue online.
1 comment on this issue so far...
On Mon 27 July 2009 at 3:47 pm Rob Egginton said…
(permalink)
From the notes, I think I get the point - Colston was a slaver and so we shouldn’t be remembering his good works as a benefactor who built schools, alms-houses etc. WITHOUT also letting people know that he was a slaver.
I assume, as there is little information about a boycott, that this was seen as an over-reaction that would punish performers and the arts?
So the question is should the hall be renamed so as to rob someone who traded in humans as commodities of an ill-gotten place in history. Is that a fair summary?
If so (and if the answer is yes) what remains is how to effect that change.
An interesting argument on the other side of the issue is whether someone who did not consider slaving to be wrong but did spend a lot of time and money on public works should be entirely vilified.
add a comment...
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.